Indian authorities have accused the popular Mumbai-based preacher Zakir Naik of supporting terrorism, which he denies.
He has 16 million followers on Facebook, 150,000 on Twitter and has given more than 4,000
lectures on Islam across the world. But Zakir Abdul
Karim Naik, the popular televangelist and Islamic preacher, is now wanted by the
Indian authorities.
Problems arose for the preacher last summer, after Bangladeshi authorities said that one of the gunmen responsible for an attack on a cafe in the Bangladeshi capital, Dhaka, which left 22 people dead, had been inspired by him.
Problems arose for the preacher last summer, after Bangladeshi authorities said that one of the gunmen responsible for an attack on a cafe in the Bangladeshi capital, Dhaka, which left 22 people dead, had been inspired by him.
Bangladesh responded by banning Peace TV, an Islamic channel broadcast
from Dubai which Naik founded in 2006 and which claims to reach 100 million
people worldwide.
The 51-year-old denied supporting violence, releasing a video statement
in which he said: "Killing innocent beings is the second major sin in
Islam."
But in November, India's counterterrorism agency, the National Investigation Agency (NIA), filed a First Information Report, an official police complaint, against Naik and the Mumbai-based non-profit Islamic Research Foundation (IRF) that he founded in 1991, accusing him of indulging in unlawful activities and promoting religious hatred.
But in November, India's counterterrorism agency, the National Investigation Agency (NIA), filed a First Information Report, an official police complaint, against Naik and the Mumbai-based non-profit Islamic Research Foundation (IRF) that he founded in 1991, accusing him of indulging in unlawful activities and promoting religious hatred.
The Hindu nationalist government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi responded
by imposing a five-year ban on the IRF under the country's anti-terror laws.
'Illegal, unjustified, unwarranted'
Naik's lawyer, Mubeen Solkar, told Al Jazeera that he will
"challenge the ban before an appropriate court".
"We have got sufficient grounds to show that the ban was not only
illegal but also unjustified and unwarranted," he added.
India's Enforcement Directorate, which investigates economic crimes, has
accused the IRF of money laundering and closed its properties in Mumbai. An
educational trust run by Naik has also been prevented from receiving funds from
abroad.
Solkar denies that his client has been involved in money laundering.
"All the transactions were done through banks and all the funds came
through legal channels," he said.
"There is nothing to show that any of the amounts would constitute
proceeds of crime, which is a requirement under the PML Act [Prevention of
Money Laundering Act]."
Where is Naik now?
Naik has not returned to India since last July.
His whereabouts are currently not known, although he has in recent
months given interviews and conducted a press conference via Skype from Saudi
Arabia, which has bestowed on him one of the country's highest
awards for "service to Islam".
There have been rumours that he has been granted Saudi citizenship, but there has been no official confirmation of this.
There have been rumours that he has been granted Saudi citizenship, but there has been no official confirmation of this.
He has offered to be questioned via video-conferencing, but the Indian
authorities have refused, and earlier this month approached Interpol, the
International Police Organisation, seeking his arrest and return to India.
Naik considers this to be part of a broader Indian government agenda.
In September, before the charges were filed and the ban imposed, Naik
wrote an open letter in which he said: "This is not
just an attack on me, it's an attack against Indian Muslims. And it's an attack
against peace, democracy and justice."
In a subsequent open letter after
the charges and ban, he wrote: "IRF and I were set up for a ban .... It is
now proven that the decision to ban IRF was taken months ago and it was a
communal decision. Before investigations were done, even before reports [were]
submitted, the ban was already decided ... Whether it was owing to my religion
or some other reason does not matter. What matters now is that my work of 25
years - completely lawful work - has been banned. And that is the most
unfortunate thing for this country."
'Hounded by the media'
His view is shared by many within India's Muslim community, members of
which have come under attack from far-right Hindu groups associated with Modi's
ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
Kashif-ul-Huda is the editor of news website
TwoCircles.net, which focuses on Muslim issues in India. He feels Naik has been
targeted because he is a Muslim.
"Some of the statements of Zakir Naik
are problematic and his style confrontational, but he never preached violence.
His lectures were always open and recordings freely available," he said.
"If such a person can be hounded by the
Indian media without a shred of evidence, you can imagine what happens to lesser
mortals who get arrested on trumped-up charges," he added, alluding to a
number of cases where Muslims have been jailed on terror charges only later to
be found innocent.
But BJP spokesperson Nalin Kohli refuted the
charges of bias and told Al Jazeera: "[The] Indian judicial system is
known for its impartiality. It may be slow, but everyone gets justice
eventually.
"India does not require [a] certificate
of its secular identity from [Zakir] Naik, who is an absconder," Kohli
added.
Solkar, Naik's lawyer, stressed that his
client had not committed any offence under the anti-terror UAPA law.
Six months after the police complaint was filed, Solkar said "no charge-sheet has been filed so far before the NIA court".
Six months after the police complaint was filed, Solkar said "no charge-sheet has been filed so far before the NIA court".
But Kohli from the BJP said that the charges
and evidence against Naik are "significant".
"That he has spoken in support of
organisations engaged in gruesome terror is documented and available," he
added.
"If he has done no wrong he has nothing
to fear. But if he absconds, he is only going to raise further questions about
his conduct and evidence against him."
The Indian authorities have previously accused Naik of influencing young people in southern Kerala state to join the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as ISIS). But Naik has denied these charges and has criticised ISIL, referring to it as the "anti-Islamic state".
The Indian authorities have previously accused Naik of influencing young people in southern Kerala state to join the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, also known as ISIS). But Naik has denied these charges and has criticised ISIL, referring to it as the "anti-Islamic state".
Controversy
The doctor-turned-televangelist has been a
figure of some controversy since the early 1990s.
Naik insists that his dawah work - the
act of proselytising for Islam - is allowed by the constitution, which permits
every citizen to follow and propagate their religion. But the issue of
conversion remains controversial and several states have anti-conversion laws.
Some have accused Naik of using sectarian
language, while parody videos making
fun of what critics call his "illogical arguments" have been posted
on YouTube.
There have been media reports that at one of
his public talks he called on all Muslims to become
terrorists - a statement Naik has said was taken out of
context.
He has been denied a visa to the UK and
Canada, while Malaysia has banned
his lectures. Hindraf, a Malaysian minority rights group, is demanding that
Malaysia cancel Naik's permanent residency there.
Mohammad Reyaz, who teaches communication at
Aliah University in Kolkata, explains that Naik began preaching at a time when
India was witnessing a rise in far-right Hindu groups.
The medieval-era Babri mosque in the city of
Ayodhya was demolished in 1992 by a Hindu nationalist mob, who wanted to build
a temple in its place. The temple movement was spearheaded by Lal Krishna
Advani - a one-time mentor of Prime Minister Modi.
Mumbai, Naik's home city, was ravaged by
religious riots in the aftermath of the mosque's demolition, which left around 1,700 dead across the
country, the majority Muslims.
"In the 1990s, after the demolition of
Babri masjid [mosque], Muslims felt betrayed and dejected. Traditional clerics
in those times - and even now - totally appeared out of sync with [the]
time," Reyaz explained.
"Naik filled the leadership vacuum and
overnight turned into [a] messiah for young Muslim youth looking for some
escape. He not only provided them [with] answers to all the Islamophobic
questions Muslims had to face every day, but gave a new-found confidence in who
they were."
Reyaz explains that part of his appeal to younger and educated Muslims comes from the fact that he is "articulate and speaks in English and wears a Western suit".
Reyaz explains that part of his appeal to younger and educated Muslims comes from the fact that he is "articulate and speaks in English and wears a Western suit".
READ MORE:
Bangladesh to ban Islamic TV channel after Dhaka attack
In 2009, Peace TV Urdu was launched, followed
by Peace TV Bangla in April 2011.
In 2012, Peace TV was banned by the previous Indian government headed by the centre-left Congress Party. India's intelligence agencies have been wary of Peace TV as it propagates the Wahabi school of Islam.
In 2012, Peace TV was banned by the previous Indian government headed by the centre-left Congress Party. India's intelligence agencies have been wary of Peace TV as it propagates the Wahabi school of Islam.
"Naik being the face of this brand of
Islam in India [he] became the easy target," explained Reyaz.
"The Islamophobia has filtered down to a
stage where all conservative Muslims are seen as possible terrorists; the
distinction between conservatism and extremism has got blurred."
0 Comments